Skip to the labels
Messengerupdate

NHL Games & Standings

Blue Jackets’ 2-0 Lead Slips Away in 5-3 Loss to Blues

Curtis Deem 378 reads

Columbus led 2-0, then lost its structure as St. Louis took over the second period and claimed a 5-3 win.

Blue Jackets’ 2-0 Lead Slips Away in 5-3 Loss to Blues

Columbus had the lead and a chance to build on a strong showing against Pittsburgh. Instead, the Blue Jackets’ 5-3 loss to St. Louis on Oct. 10 exposed how quickly their game can unravel when the players stop working as a unit. The Blues didn’t need a dominant performance to take control; Columbus gave them room to seize it.

Google Discover
St. Louis Blues right wing Jimmy Snuggerud shoots and scores against Columbus Blue Jackets goaltender Jet Greaves during the second period at Enterprise Center on Oct. 10, 2026.
Jimmy Snuggerud scores against Jet Greaves in the second period at Enterprise Center on Oct. 10, 2026. | Jeff Curry-Imagn Images

A lead without control

The 2-0 advantage Columbus carried into the second period looked better on the scoreboard than it did in the flow of play. The Jackets had already allowed odd-man rushes, and their decisions with the puck lacked consistency. At times they forced a pass when a dump-in made more sense; elsewhere, they gave up possession when a pass was available. That indecision left the team chasing the game even while ahead.

It’s a frustrating kind of breakdown because there wasn’t one obvious problem to fix. Columbus’ defensive shape faltered, its players seemed to operate on separate tracks, and the Blues found opportunities to attack. The result was a team that looked disconnected across the ice. Against a club that can capitalize on mistakes, a lead doesn’t offer much protection when the underlying play is unstable.

St. Louis took three goals in the second period, while outshooting Columbus 12-3 in the frame. Jimmy Snuggerud scored during that stretch, beating goaltender Jet Greaves, as the home side turned a quiet building into an energized one. The available account doesn’t identify every scorer or describe each goal, but the shot count and three-goal swing tell the story: the Blues drove the period, and Columbus couldn’t slow them down.

For the game details, see the NHL game center.

A momentum shift and a short-lived response

A fight involving Mathieu Olivier and Ross Johnston became a turning point in the game’s feel. Olivier accepted the challenge, but the timing gave the crowd something to rally around while Columbus was trying to protect its lead. The sequence didn’t determine the result on its own; the larger problem was that the Jackets were already struggling to manage the pace and keep their structure intact.

Afterward, St. Louis pushed forward and Columbus spent much of the second period reacting. The home team’s 12-3 edge in shots captured the change in pressure. The crowd’s energy may have helped the Blues build on that push, but the Jackets still had to find a way to regain possession, settle the game and reconnect their lines. They didn’t manage it in time.

Coach Rick Bowness shuffled the lines in the third period, and the adjustment produced a brief surge. That response showed Columbus could create some life even after the game had tilted against it. But the push faded, and the team couldn’t turn it into a sustained recovery. Line changes can disrupt an opponent’s matchups or give struggling players a fresh look; they can’t solve a broader breakdown if the same disconnected play returns.

Two games, two very different versions

The contrast with Friday’s game against Pittsburgh sharpened the concern. Columbus had looked poised and confident in that contest, which went to a shootout, and showed signs of progress. The Blues game offered a sharp counterpoint: the Jackets struggled to make connected decisions, and even a two-goal cushion didn’t calm them down. One strong night can signal progress, but consistency is what makes that progress meaningful.

St. Louis didn’t need to overwhelm Columbus from the opening faceoff. The Jackets’ own errors and lack of cohesion helped make the Blues look more commanding than they had been. That distinction matters for the response: the lesson isn’t simply that the opponent was better. Columbus needs to review how it handled the puck, protected its shape and responded when momentum changed.

There’s useful video in a loss like this, especially for a team coming off a performance that had looked encouraging. The key is whether Columbus can recognize the recurring choices that pulled its players out of sync and correct them in the next game. Against St. Louis, the lead was real, but the control behind it wasn’t. If the Jackets want Friday’s progress to count for something, they’ll need to bring that poise with them when a game starts to turn.

Source: Curtis Deem · unionandblue.com

Same drawer